Another thing that affects mobile coverage is the frequency being used. In general, lower frequencies travel further and penetrate buildings more easily, while higher frequencies can provide more capacity and speed but don't travel as far.
| Technology |
Typical frequencies |
General behaviour |
| Analogue TV |
VHF / UHF |
High-power broadcasts covering large areas |
| Freeview |
UHF |
Digital TV using spectrum much more efficiently |
| 2G / GSM |
900 / 1800 MHz |
900 MHz gives good range and building penetration |
| 3G |
900 / 2100 MHz |
Lower frequencies give better coverage; higher frequencies more capacity |
| 4G |
800 / 1800 / 2100 / 2600 MHz |
A mixture of coverage and capacity bands |
| 5G |
700 / 2100 / 3500 MHz+ |
Lower bands cover further; higher bands provide more capacity but shorter range |
There's also an interesting link between old analogue television and modern mobile networks. When analogue TV was switched off, some of the spectrum it had occupied was freed up. The 800 MHz band was subsequently used for mobile services, including 4G, and the 700 MHz band was later cleared from Freeview and made available for mobile use.
That means my Vodafone connection on Band 20 at 800 MHz is using a frequency that was once part of the television spectrum.
It also helps explain why that connection can work well inside a house. 800 MHz is a relatively low mobile frequency, so it has useful range and building penetration compared with higher-frequency mobile bands.
Of course, frequency isn't everything. The amount of spectrum available, how busy the cell is, interference, the phone itself and the network configuration all affect the speed you actually get.